![]() ![]() "We look forward to advancing this litigation on behalf of consumers and businesses that were left with slower and less secure computers due to the defects found in Intel's processors. "We are pleased with the Court's decision, which found that the claims we allege show Intel 'took advantage of consumers' lack of knowledge such that the resulting unfairness was glaringly noticeable, flagrant, complete, and unmitigated,' said Christopher Seeger, an attorney with Seeger Weiss LLP, who is lead counsel for the plaintiffs, in an emailed statement. Intel fails to get Spectre, Meltdown chip flaw class-action super-suit tossed out JanuTH Author Intel will have to defend itself against claims that the semiconductor goliath knew its microprocessors were defective and failed to tell customers. The likely off-ramp for Intel, in the absence of further procedural defenses, would be a settlement – a trial runs the risk of a significant damage award. Both AMD and Intel have been affected by Spectre and Meltdown, but Intel has historically been hit harder. The case isn't yet destined for trial as there are more procedural steps along that road. A new Meltdown-style security flaw has been detected, this time on AMD CPUs. Please, no Moore: 'Law' that defined how chips have been made for decades has run itself into a cul-de-sac.Boffins find if you torture AMD Zen+, Zen 2 CPUs enough, they are vulnerable to Meltdown-like attack.The application can see whether or not something completes fast or slow and. ![]() If it tries to read something not in the cache, it will complete slower. An application can attempt to read memory and, if it reads something in the cache, the operation will complete faster. out and compute both the outcome of whether A is true or. The core problem with both Meltdown and Spectre lies within the CPU’s cache. When the world ends, all that will be left are cockroaches and new Rowhammer attacks: RAM defenses broken again PDF Speculative execution (Spectre) and Meltdown is a chip attempting to predict the future.Intel's recent Atom, Celeron, Pentium chips can be lulled into a debug mode, potentially revealing system secrets."For the seven plaintiffs who purchased computers after September 1, 2017, they have alleged enough facts at this stage of the proceedings to survive Intel's motion to dismiss on the grounds of failure to state a claim." "Based on plaintiffs' allegations, it is not clear that Intel had a countervailing business interest other than profit for delaying disclosure for as long as it did (through the holiday season), for downplaying the negative effects of the mitigation, for suppressing the effects of the mitigation, and for continuing to embargo further security exploits that affect only Intel processors," the judge wrote in his order.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |